Pedal Chile

View Original

How Many Calories Do You Burn on e-bikes

How many calories do you burn on an electronic pedal-assist bicycle? 

The average e-cyclist burns between 300-400 CALORIES per hour or approximately 25% fewer calories compared to non-pedal assist bicyclists. 

  • e-MTB riders burn more calories compared to e-cyclists, however, they burn 30% fewer calories compared to non-pedal-assist-mountain bikers.


E-cycling & calories

A 2018 study conducted “a systematic literature review of studies examining physical activity, cardio-respiratory, metabolic and psychological outcomes associated with e-cycling.” The results:

  1. 4399 papers were initially identified. After screening and further analysis, 17 papers were included in this study 

  2. E-cycling provides less activity compared to conventional cycling

  3. E-cycling provided more physical activity than walking 

  4. Calories burned per hour: 294 to 390 kcal/hour 

  5. Percentage of maximum heart rate: 67-79 (lower than conventional bike riding) 

The researchers' conclusion:

"In this novel systematic review provide moderate evidence that e-cycling elicits activity at an intensity high enough to promote some positive health outcomes. E-cycling leads to reduced activity volume and intensity over the same distance compared to conventional cycling. Therefore, e-cycling requires more frequent and longer rides to accrue comparable health benefits."

-International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity


Lu - Pedal Chile guide on an E-Fat Tire Bicycle in Chile’s Patagonia


E-bike vs traditional bike & calories

A 2017 study from the Journal of Transport & Health, compared the calories expended of e-bikes, walkers, and traditional bikes:

  • e-Bikes = 24% less calories compared to traditional bike

  • e-Bikes = 64% fewer calories compared to walkers (mile per mile)

E-mtb vs mountain bike & calories

A 2017 study from BYU rode a 5.5 mile (8.8 km) singletrack loop while riding the 2017 Specialized Turbo Levo FSR Comp Carbon 6Fattie Mountain e-Bike and the non-pedal assist version of the same bike. This loop also featured a 5% incline over a one-mile (1.6 km) stretch:

  • The study found that the eMTB riders completed the 5.5-mile loop 50% faster than the traditional mountain bike

  • The average heart rate was 7% higher for the non-eMTB group


See this chart in the original post

Lu - on an e-bike


See this chart in the original post

This study didn’t calculate calories expended. However, based on the data that was provided, fairly accurate caloric estimations can be determined:

  • 597 calories burned for non-pedal assist mountain bikers * 

  • 369 calories for eMTB riders*

  • (*both numbers are estimates of calories burned during the 5.5-mile loop) 

The regular mountain bike rider burned nearly 50% more calories over the same distance of single-track riding compared to the eMTB bicyclist.  

This is the only reputable study that compares pedal-assist mountain biking to non-pedal assist mountain biking. This makes quantifying the exact differences in energy expenditure difficult to extrapolate to the broader masses of e-MTB riders.

However, this does provide good data for comparisons between the differences in physical exertion levels between the two types of bikes.

E-bikers spend more time on their bike???



It’s very common to hear that e-bikers spend more time in the saddle compared to their non-pedal-assist pals.

A 2019 study from Europe concluded that e-bikers travel longer distances and use their bikes more frequently compared to traditional cyclists. However, this data was sourced from 7 European cities, where bikes are used in place of cars and public transit.

In the previous study, e-MTB riders completed the singletrack loop 50% faster, while exerting significantly less effort in doing so.


However, if the e-riders want to increase their caloric expenditure just simply doing another lap or trail will result in a similar total caloric burn.



How much of a ‘boost’ do e-bikes provide?

  • Most e-bikes provide 250 to 900 watts or about 1/3 horsepower to 1.2 horsepower

  • In the USA, the maximum speed allowed for e-bikes is 28 mph (32 kph) in most public places

    • At 28 mph the pedal-assist feature reaches its limit and no longer provides any further assistance to the rider

quick review

Riding a pedal-assist bike, whether it’s an e-MTB or e-bike burns approximately 25% fewer calories compared to traditional bikes. However, many people ride bikes for many other reasons besides to ‘burn calories.’ 

I occasionally ride an e-MTB since we offer an e-MTB tour in Patagonia and enjoy riding all bikes, regardless of who or what is doing the pedaling.


Scientifically formulated to go fast - learn more


Jesse is the Director of Pedal Chile and lives in La Patagonia. Jesse has a Master of Science in Health and Human Performance and a Bachelor of Science in Kinesiology. Hobbies: Mountain biking, eMTBing, reading, researching, and trying new craft beers.  


Additional articles I have written:

See this gallery in the original post
  • Sources:

  1. Bourne, Jessica E., et al. “Health Benefits of Electrically-Assisted Cycling: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 15, no. 1, 21 Nov. 2018, ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8, 10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8.

  2. Castro, Alberto, et al. “Physical Activity of Electric Bicycle Users Compared to Conventional Bicycle Users and Non-Cyclists: Insights Based on Health and Transport Data from an Online Survey in Seven European Cities.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 1, June 2019, p. 100017, 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100017.

  3. De La Iglesia, Daniel, et al. “Increasing the Intensity over Time of an Electric-Assist Bike Based on the User and Route: The Bike Becomes the Gym.” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 2, 14 Jan. 2018, p. 220, 10.3390/s18010220.

  4. Fishman, Elliot, and Christopher Cherry. “E-Bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research.” Transport Reviews, vol. 36, no. 1, 30 July 2015, pp. 72–91, peopleforbikes.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/E-bikes-in-the-Mainstream.pdf, 10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907.

  5. Hall, Cougar, et al. “Pedal-Assist Mountain Bikes: A Pilot Study Comparison of the Exercise Response, Perceptions, and Beliefs of Experienced Mountain Bikers.” JMIR Formative Research, vol. 3, no. 3, 13 Aug. 2019, p. e13643, 10.2196/13643.

  6. Langford, Brian Casey, et al. “Comparing Physical Activity of Pedal-Assist Electric Bikes with Walking and Conventional Bicycles.” Journal of Transport & Health, vol. 6, Sept. 2017, pp. 463–473, 10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.002.

  7. “Physical Activity of Electric Bicycle Users Compared to Conventional Bicycle Users and Non-Cyclists: Insights Based on Health and Transport Data from an Online Survey in Seven European Cities.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 1, June 2019, p. 100017, 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100017.